http://crone-mod.livejournal.com/ (
crone-mod.livejournal.com) wrote in
thatrainbowcity2008-05-28 04:11 pm
So... about that kiss...
... Right, wrong comm. On to business:
130 muns and over 4800 posts later, we would like to thank you for making this the most successful, least bloody HMD ever.
Now that everyone has had a chance to see this alternate version of HMD in play, we'd like your opinions on it. Did it work for you? Was it too nice? Were you able to get your crit across through questions? Do you want it changed back, other changes, whatever?
[Poll #1195389]
Please give us your thoughts in comments if you find that the suggestion box isn't enough for you. If you don't give us your suggestions, your response will default to a straight yes or straight no when we consolidate the results.
130 muns and over 4800 posts later, we would like to thank you for making this the most successful, least bloody HMD ever.
Now that everyone has had a chance to see this alternate version of HMD in play, we'd like your opinions on it. Did it work for you? Was it too nice? Were you able to get your crit across through questions? Do you want it changed back, other changes, whatever?
[Poll #1195389]
Please give us your thoughts in comments if you find that the suggestion box isn't enough for you. If you don't give us your suggestions, your response will default to a straight yes or straight no when we consolidate the results.

no subject
I think the new way will work, as long as people who are too nervous about saying anything un-anon will remember that crit posts are there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I feel like this was an excellent "training wheels" exercise. People were well behaved, if maybe a little overly nice (I saw very little crit, to be honest). I'd love to see next HMD with this kind of behavior expected - polite, questions vs straight crit - but with anon enabled again. I think a big reason why there was as little crit as there was, is because plenty of people don't want awkwardness within crews or friends. Anon alleviates that. If everyone stays as civil as they've proven themselves to be able to be, I don't think it should be a problem.
Overall I did enjoy this HMD and think you guys did a great job.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm interested as well. I'm always frankly fascinated by each poll and how things are going to shake down.
no subject
I think the only con I can think of is either people were too nervous to give actual constructive criticism, or that they just bit their tongue entirely. While it's good to see that wonderfully friendly and open, there also needs to be a friendly reminder you can give constructive criticism WITH being friendly.
All and all? I liked this HMD. I actually GOT good constructive criticism.
Encourage that when you're giving constructive criticism? It's supposed to help you grow. People seem to forget the constructive part of this. If you introduce the same rules as before, I think it'll run smoothly. I also really, REALLY did like when people actually asked questions, to clarify things, if they were going to give concrit.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I guess that's pretty much it~
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think it was a great turn out, both in critics and in people putting up pups, but it felt as though people were really only coming out to say, "you're doing a great job" except in a select few cases.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'd like to go on record as thinking bringing Anon back is a good idea. I didn't get any commentary on my own characters as even vaguely hey-why-don't-you-fix-____, and although I think of myself as fairly approachable, I noticed that was the case for a lot of people, and not having it made me feel more hesitant to raise some points, as well.
no subject
no subject
I thought it was a good exercise, and I second the request for more than one HMD thread next time, since it was...well, so massive this time.
no subject
However, reiterating what a few other people have said above, more than one thread probably would make sense. I'm not sure if this would work or not, but if the mods still try to keep that master list of players/pups current (and I'm sure you do because you guys just rock), perhaps splitting the player's nick names up alphabetically? (i.e. players A-M, thread 1, players N-Z thread 2).
Of course I'm sure that could go totally FUBAR, but hey, a suggestion is a suggestion, ne?
no subject